- I refused to jump on the Davidson bandwagon before the tournament began, because I believed that wagon was already full after their performance in the tournament last year. In hindsight, I completely over thought this issue. Just because Davidson and Stephen Curry (son of Dell Curry, if you didn't know) were on my radar all season long did not mean that they were on anyone else's radar. Unfortunately, I avoided choosing Davidson as one of my Bracket Busters because in my mind, they were already America's darling team and a sexy first-round upset pick. I will pat myself on the back and point out that I was already on the Davidson train way back in this blog's second post. Coach Bob McKillop deserves some huge props, it's one thing to come up with a game-plan to beat Elon (a notable seed), it's a completely different thing to come up with a game-plan to beat Gonzaga and Georgetown. Well done Bob. Stephen Curry is hands-down the most outstanding player of this tournament so far. On this sport's biggest stage, he has thrived when it mattered most. Curry scored 30 of his 40 points against Gonzaga in the second half, and followed that by scoring 25 of his 30 points against Georgetown in the second half. That's just sick! When was the last time anybody put up 25 against the Hoyas in a half?!? Credit also needs to be given to Jason Richards, Davidson's point guard, who played all 40 minutes against Georgetown, scored 20 points, and had 5 assists with only one turnover against the Hoyas' pressure defense. My friend Phil went to Davidson and is the only reason I knew about this program prior to last season. I told him Sunday night that I've officially hopped aboard the Davidson bandwagon and he gladly welcomed me. There is no reason that this Davidson team cannot beat Wisconsin on Friday. With the lights-out shooting of Stephen Curry and the outstanding point guard play of Jason Richards, anything is possible...if not downright probable.
- I'm becoming more and more obsessed with point-guard play, as I truly believe a college team's success is directly related to the quality of the man that's distributing the ball. With that in mind...the following stat astounded me: Stanford's point guard, Mitch Johnson, had 16 assists and only 1 turnover while playing 44 minutes in the Cardinal's overtime victory against Marquette. He played all but one minute of the game and only had one turnover against the athletic guards of Marquette. I'm in awe of that line. Point guards never get enough of the credit, even though they are the most crucial element to how a team performs and functions. Oh...I forgot to mention that Johnson ran this team to near perfection and kept them composed after head coach, Trent Johnson, was ejected from the game. Perhaps the most unsung performance of the first round. Outstanding game Mitch.
- The fact that four double-digit seeds all won games at the same site (Tampa Bay) seems like a complete statistical anomaly to me. Tim Brando and Mike Gminski had a blast calling those games and everyone in attendance got their money's worth. I was sad to see Drake (the pride of Des Moines, Iowa) get bounced, but their overtime, last second loss to Western Kentucky may go down as the best game of this tournament. #12 Villanova and #12 Western Kentucky move on to the Sweet Sixteen. Thank you Tampa Bay.
- Villanova coach Jay Wright did look quite dapper during the Wildcat's upset victory over #5 Clemson, but how the heck did he not get charged with a technical foul near the end of that game? *(I need to make a correction here - Jay Wright was assessed a technical foul with 2:59 left in the Clemson game. What I meant to question here was that he was not given a 2nd technical foul and ejected from the game. Please see my comment below)* He was out of control and showing up the refs. The officiating needs to be more consistent across the board during the NCAA Tournament. Mild-mannered Stanford coach, Trent Johnson, gets thrown out of a game and Wright doesn't even get one technical? I saw palming get called at least 4 times over the weekend after not seeing it called all season. Various Pitt players were getting mauled at the end of the Michigan State game and not getting whistles after the game had been called tight up to that point. And everyone knows by now that UCLA's Josh Shipp assaulted Texas A&M's Donald Sloan on the potential game-tying basket. All we're asking for is a little consistency. None of this, 'we're putting the whistles away for the final 3 minutes of the game', bullcrap. And don't call palming out of the blue just to make a point. The games should be called the same in November as they are in March.
- After going 7-1 in the first round...the Big East slid a bit and is a combined 10-5 going into the Sweet Sixteen with only 3 teams remaining (Louisville, West Virginia, & Villanova). That's not too bad, but when you figure that the Big Ten has 2 teams in the Sweet Sixteen, 3 doesn't seem like enough. The fact that West Virginia and Villanova made the Sweet Sixteen, I believe says plenty about the depth and overall quality of the Big East.
- I'm terrified that Bill Self (Kansas) and Rick Barnes (Texas) are safely into the Sweet Sixteen and actually appear to be doing a decent job. Is this an omen? Should I sell all my investments now? Is this merely a tease, setting up greater disappointment and heartbreak later? Can these men actually coach and use occasional common sense? Stay Tuned...
1020 & 8101
Your Villanova watchdog is here to clarify. Jay Wright was assessed a technical foul during the Clemson game. In fact Clemson was down something like 4 points and they got to shoot 4 straight free throws to tie the game real late in the second half, could have cost 'Nova the game. He did look dapper, but it didn't help when the refs called that T on him. It was deserved, but just gave him that much more room to yell some more at the refs.
ReplyDeleteWell, I guess Phil is going to keep the lead with 13 labels in this blog, but I was glad to see that I got label #2 in your welcome back post. I could do a bracket with picks for who will win the label wars. Phil would definitely be a 1 seed, but I could still be a notable seed, and maybe I could at least beat Gilbert Brown...but that's only because Pitt's out of the tournament. And thanks for sending out props to your readers--getting props and labels (plus the side benefit of reading about the tournament) is definitely going to keep us loyal!
ReplyDeleteTime to address some comments:
ReplyDelete1) Matt - You're 100% correct. Jay Wright received a technical foul with 2:59 left in the second-half of the Clemson game that allowed the Tigers to pull within two points. I watched this game with my dad and don't know how I forgot the Wright technical. I guess what I was trying to say, in lieu of the Trent Johnson ejection, was that I was perplexed as to why Wright wasn't thrown out of the game as well. I know that the Johnson ejection happened after the Wright technical foul, but I remember thinking as I watched Jay lose all composure...that besides being very well dressed, he was dangerously close to ejection territory. Your team came back from 18 down to build a 7 point lead against Clemson and you look great...so CALM THE HELL DOWN!!! I will correct the false statement I made in the blog, without omitting my original error.
2) Annie - I love that the "labels" have become a point of conversation...and perhaps...even competition. I realize that I probably have been unfair and selective with my labels, and am going to comb over the entire blog again and make sure that every person and subject gets their proper credit. I'm very intrigued by the label bracket. I don't know how it would turn out, but things would be exciting. You would most definitely be a 'notable seed' because: 1) You just are, & 2) You were the biggest fan of the 'Notable Seed' sections in my Conference Tournament Previews. You're more than welcome for the props. I'm thankful for your loyalty.
Internet is too slow over here in China to watch games, so I could only listen to the game, the big G-O-D came through with a rainy day so the visitors decided to get massages...together...in a way that...what I'm trying to say is that they didn't go to a sketchy massage place that would have left them "happy" at the end. So I only could listen to the radio and I didn't see the Stanford incident.
ReplyDeleteNonetheless, I am not all uptight about the whole mistake, just wanted to make sure that when ESPN comes knocking at your door next year (most likely to just sell you a copy of their magazine) that you have factual information in the blog.
great props for damon. i'm enjoying all the love that davidson basketball and davidson college are garnering this week. one of the labels on espn's college basketball site is "davidson", which links you to three articles about them (one of which you linked to in this post).
ReplyDeletei think it's great and also fair that davidson is getting way more attention than the other bracket buster in this tournament, western kentucky. first, because davidson is a much smaller school. WKU is about ten times larger. second, davidson's path to get there was much harder, knocking off a number 7 and a number 2 seed, whereas WKU knocked off a weak Drake team, and then a 13 seed.
Go cats!
"WKU knocked off a weak Drake team"
ReplyDeleteHow DARE You Phil!!!